Improve understanding of what “environmental maturity” means for Synergy

To help develop an environmental stewardship program 

Following the delivery of the EY Environmental Maturity Assessment, which outlines seven areas/levers for improvement (Strategy, People, Leadership & Governance, Assurance & Reporting, Risk & Opportunity, Systems & Structures, and Digital Technology), Tandem Codesign were engaged to help understand what “environmental maturity” means for a company like Synergy and develop an environmental stewardship program. A key focus for Synergy’s recently released Environmental Strategy is to increase the average maturity from Developing to Established by the end of 2022, and then all levers to Established by 2024.

Introduction

We consulted with multiple team members across SBU to explore current projects related to our project space. This narrowed our scope to focus on Strategy, People, and Leadership, which leaves projects like Project Carnaby to focus on operations-driven processes and reporting. With our human-centred approaches to understanding behaviours, attitudes, and motivations, we believe we are best-positioned to shift and build focus on environmental thinking in staff. This will then drive environmental processes in the workplace. 

Initial scope of the project

The initial project problem

To create a successful environmental stewardship program an organisation must clearly define what it wishes to achieve and what it means by “environmental stewardship”. This improves understanding of the factors that lead to the success or failure of environmental stewardshipin different contexts. One definition of environmental stewardship programs is that they aim to “protect, care for or responsibly use the environment in pursuit of environmentaland/or social outcomes in diverse social-ecologicalcontexts.”

The Design Process

What we discovered through our research

Further research is required to understand the organisation better but from this initial discovery period we were able to find some key trends and patterns in the data that are listed here.

1. Key Challenges for the Environment Team

AN ENVIRONMENTAL CULTURE OF COMPLIANCE AND OBEDIENCE
Including a culture of blame and shame, reactive environmental systems, disconnection to the impact on the ecosystem.

THE CAPACITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TEAM
Including being under-resourced and time-poor, over-relied upon, and their communication role.

CHALLENGES WITH CURRENT COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Including a lack of an open and discussional sharing space, share-wall, email overload and lack of online engagement, and lack of environmental information prioritisation.

THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENT TEAM/SBU AND GBU
Including the physical distance and transient relationships (FC and on-site staff), top down approach and lack of cultural consideration, conflicting priorities and Environment Advisors perceived as a 'policing' role, lack of communication and transparency, the nature of environmental impact (intangible, long-term and impersonal).

SUMMARY
The combination of all of these challenges – the top-down approach with the lack of communication and relationship-building skills in the environment team, and the lack of transparency and ineffective communication systems – are all contributing to the challenges the environment team is facing. The problems and challenges we discovered here revealed larger organisational obstacles that prompted further research and will be discussed in the next section.

3. Front Facing, Recruitment & Inductions

FRONT-FACING
Including inadequate outward environmental messaging and positioning, the public perception of Synergy, the website and critical customer touchpoints, collaboration between teams and transparent organisational communication, recruitment

HIRING PROCESSES, TRAINING AND INDUCTIONS
Including the hiring process, environmental inductions content and format.

THE BACKEND: PROCUREMENT AND PRODUCTION PROCESSES
Including the procurement processes on site, environmental impact of all back-end processes.

SUMMARY
Having a strong environmental position and clear outward facing messaging at Synergy will ensure a collective understanding around what Synergy stands for environmentally. It will create pride and positive culture towards environmental impact within Synergy. It will align all staff with environmental values and encourage proactive environmental thinking. It will attract staff who value the environment and already have proactive environmental thinking in place. It will assist in the development of long-term trusted partnerships with like-minded organisations who are aligned with Synergy’s environmental strategy and it will filter out contractual partnerships with organisations who engage in greenwashing or efforts to disguise their poor environmental practices.

2. Key Problems with Organisational Structure, Leadership and Communication

STRUCTURE AND LEADERSHIP
Including unclear organisational structure, lack of direction from leadership, and inconsistency of expectations.

TRANSPARENCY AND COMMUNICATION
Including siloed business units, leadership type (top down and oneway communication), challenges with Freedom of Information, missed opportunities for sharing positive environmental stories.

IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
Including organisational strategies, and challenges with collaboration and follow through.

SUMMARY
The broader problems mentioned in this section are contributing to the challenges around establishing effective environmental stewardship within the organisation. Although Tandem Codesign was not hired to develop a new organisational structure, the existing structure and its subsequent barricades (such as top-down approaches, limited transparency, one-way communications and confusion around leadership roles) are restricting the organisation from reaching its goal of becoming environmentally mature. These insights therefore triggered further research to explore how these organisational problems may be overcome, the results of which will be discussed in upcoming sections.


4. What is Working Well

THE SUCCESSFUL HEALTH & SAFETY CULTURE TRANSFORMATION 
Including mindset change, leadership driven, longterm incremental change process, personalisation, key differences between Enviro and Health & Safety,

ENGAGED AND PROACTIVE STAFF CULTURE
Including workforce transition team, leadership promotes staff engagement, proactive culture and continuous improvement, positive change in environmental culture, local pride and connection to the natural environment.

PINJAR: COMMUNITY AND PROACTIVITY
Including community culture, proactive thinking and environmental awareness.

ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES
Including the new strategy, new environmental team and strategy, and small scale initiatives.

SUMMARY
Synergy staff have shown that they are capable of adapting their behaviour to adopt innovative approaches to organisational structures and systems. A range of Synergy staff have revealed their care for the environment through their cultural connections such as staff living and working at the Muja site in Collie. Time is needed to build understanding of environmental impact among staff and the individualised action that could be taken to overcome it. Staff need education on how to identify their own personal responsibility for instigating environmental stewardship and what that means for individual and team roles within Synergy. Overall, Synergy staff have demonstrated that they are enthusiastic about addressing their environmental concerns but they need strong leadership to clarify how they can get involved to drive positive change around environmental stewardship. Pathways which address how this might happen are explored in our concepts sections.

Generating ideas and concepts to help

Based on insights from background and ethnographic research, the following 5 goals have been devised to respond to opportunities and strengths that were identified that would help build the Environmental Maturity of the organisation. Each of the following outputs have been designed to address two or more of these goals.

The Goals:

1. CLARITY OF FUTURE GOALS
Making sure that all teams and individuals at Synergy understand what the organisation’s goals actually are and how they relate to them.

2. CLEAR COMMUNICATION OF INTENTIONS 
Communicating how these goals will be achieved at an organisational, team and individual level. Making sure that everyone knows what they need to do in order to achieve their goals.

3. CODESIGNING HOW GOALS WILL BE ACHIEVED 
If staff are part of the process of developing their own plan for how to achieve their goals, they will be better positioned to achieve them.

4.  A COLLECTIVE PRIDE IN COMMUNITY AND THEIR WORK 
Fostering more pride in what Synergy are currently doing to help the environment will help generate positivity around future goals.

5. EMPOWERMENT OF INDIVIDUAL KNOWLEDGE 
Encouraging staff to draw on their own skills and knowledge to achieve goals. Look out for the above icons on the following pages that link each output to the corresponding goal.

What we made

Integration of Two Current Systems into One

How might we integrate the current EHS reporting processes to frame environmental risks as health and safety risks?

This concept looks to explore how we might integrate environmental language, understanding and action into similar existing processes such as health and safety reporting.

This concept looks to develop cultural and site specific language to prompt the identification of environmental hazards within health and safety hazards and their impact on the ecosystem overall. We know the importance of using language that resonates with staff as an effective way to engage them. We experienced this firsthand in our kick-off session where we used word association activities to explore the meaning of ‘Environmental Maturity’. This activity highlighted the importance of building understanding of complex terms through individual exploration and resulted in excitement around the project rather than the dread that had previously been elicited by the term. We then propose an exploration comparison of these two processes to understand if they could be streamlined, integrated or improved to reduce workload and free up capacity of the Environment Team.

Goals addressed: 2 and 3.

Personalising Environmental Strategy

How might we help Synergy staff to understand the Environmental Strategy within the context of their own work?

This concept looks to directly inform and potentially adjust staff perceptions around environmental stewardship. We look to embed Synergy’s environmental strategy within all business units from top management down to operational levels. The purpose is to outline how the environmental strategy integrates into all roles, team and individual, within the organisation. This will empower all staff to individually understand their personal impact or their ‘why’ when it comes to environmental stewardship, practice and mindset.

Goals addressed: 1, 2 and 3.

Organisational Design

How might we structure Synergy staff and teams to promotetransparency around environmental goals and increase theefficiency of teams?

This concept endeavours to develop an organisational structure that reframes hierarchy to promote individual empowerment and project transparency for all staff across all positions. The creation of a staffing layout that improves transparency and ensures two-way staffing communications will also allow for individual empowerment of all staff which is essential for the environmental stewardship program to succeed. Repositioning staff into spaces that connect with all teams and management will provide more effective organisational spaces for collaborative project development and cohesive strategy alignment with Synergy’s environmental policies. The purpose of this innovative organisational structure is to motivate staff from all areas to become proactive rather than reactive within their processes at Synergy. It will allow staff to move from simply following Synergy procedures to identifying and actioning environmental stewardship from within their own role.

Goals addressed:1, 2,3, 4 and 5.

Communication

How might we deliver environmental information in a way that is engaging, accessible and relevant for all Synergy staff?

The current environmental team are not skilled inthe area of communication therefore they are notable to communicate their messaging effectively. More effective interactive spaces and accessiblelanguage is required for effective delivery and uptake of environmental information.

Part 1: Channels:
Create a strategic communication system to assist the messaging around environmental stewardship and ensure staff receive environmental information in a way that integrates seamlessly into the way they carry out their roles. This includes face-to-face spaces as well as digital spaces.

Part 2: Content:
Closer collaboration between the environment team and the strategic communications team to translate scientific info into relevant and engaging content for the rest of the organisation. This would involve looking to ‘translate’ policy into language that resonates with context of staff andusing visualisation to make sense of complex information.

Goals addressed: 2 and 4.

Hiring Process

How might we deliver environmental information in a way that is engaging, accessible and relevant for all Synergy staff?

Part 1 - External Messaging :
This concept endeavours to develop external messaging via website, social media and other communication avenues that align with desired future employees.

Part 2 - Hiring Staff:
With an Environmental Ethos By vocalising Synergy’s environmental ethos via job advertisements, selection criteria and interview processes, potential staff will recognise the importance of their own environmental stance.

Part 3 - Staff Inductions: 
Synergy also needs to develop staff inductions and initial training processes that educate and align staff with Synergy’s environmental values. This will create an in-depth understanding for all incoming staff across the organisation (not just from an operational and licensing perspective) on how they can be environmentally responsible and proactive in their roles.

Goals addressed: 1, 2 and 3.

Procurement Process

How might we ensure that Synergy considers the environmental impact of its purchasing habits and procurement of contractors?

This concept looks to explore how we might support the introduction of the ESG framework to the procurement of contractors who are hired to support Synergy’s operations. This is to ensure that all associates of Synergy provide products and service offerings that align with Synergy’s environmental strategy.

Part 1 - Contractors: Examining the procurement processes used to determine the alignment of Contractors with Synergy’s environmental operating requirements and values. As contractors are such a large presence on site, it is crucial to amply environmental values in this cohort.

Part 2 - Supply Chain of Products:
Understanding the environmental impact of the supply chain for all resources purchased by Synergy. This would allow development of selection criteria for these various types of supplies used throughout the organisation sites to ensure Synergy is supporting businesses that have positive environmental and social impact that align with Synergy’s values. This would also involve up-skilling of the Supply Chain Team to carry this role.

Goals addressed: 1, 2 and 4.

Environmental Champions

How might we embed environmental mindsets in each team throughout the organisation?

This concept looks to activate environmental stewardship within individual staff and their associated teams to ensure environmental consciousness is embedded across all sectors of the organisation of Synergy.

This idea proposes to nominate one staff member from each team across the entire organisation to be an environmental influencer or champion for their team. They would engage directly with the environmental team to workshop strategies to implement in their own team. To bolster the effectiveness of the environmental champion, we advise linking workshops to the current continuous improvement system to include the whole of the Forrest Centre.

Note: This concept would coincide with the expansion of the Continuous Improvement system across the organisation. This will ensure ideas are resourced appropriately and have dedicated staff for their implementation, resulting in follow-through of projects.

Goals addressed: 1, 2 and 4

Incentives to Drive Motivation

How might we motivate and empower staff through team and individual incentives rather than a focus on compliance?

This concept looks to incentivise staff and teams toencourage an environmental mindset through activecompetition either with themselves or with others.

This strategy intends to reduce environmental impact by creating a playful but competitive environment for staff to measure their personal impact and team project impact.

Individual staff and teams could set goals to reach such as reducing scope 3 emissions, reducing waste, engaging in more environmentally focused practices, etc and be rewarded once they reach them. (For example, think Apple watch exercise rings which allow youto set exercise step targets to reach or banking apps which allow you to create saving goals).

This concept aims to move Synergy beyond reactive legislative compliance towards proactive environmental action.

It also aims to build a positive team culture and nurturing camaraderie that takes pride in their work through reward for their incentivised results.

Individual and team incentive concepts might vary across teams and sites in terms of personal interests and the goal settings that would be attached to those interests. This challenge can be overcome by allowing staff and staffing teams to create their own incentive goals to reach.

Goals addressed: 1, 2, 3 and 4. 

What happens next ...

As Stage 1 of this project ends, Tandem is excited to share the findings of this discovery phase and the proposed concepts to be implemented. We look forward to continuing to work with Synergy to dive deeper into each of these concepts and further understand how best to create positive change in this organisation. Organisational change is not easy. In particular making changes to green behaviour is difficult.

The proposed changes will have benefits beyond the scope of the environmental stewardship project andincrease the overall efficiency and current systemsand culture of Synergy in the long-term.Better systems and communications within Synergy are particularly important as we are in a time of great social, environmental and economic change. Through organisational structural change and transparent communication, all staff and teams can work together towards the vision of a sustainable future for WA and for the planet.These changes will enable Synergy to operate in an optimal way to achieve a shared environmental vision.

Although Synergy is just one energycompany operating in an isolated nation, it is alarge organisation with many employees in various locations and communities around the state. This wide-reaching influence gives Synergy the potential to create large-scale social change toward asustainable future for generations to come.