What we discovered through our research
Through research, interviews, and workshops, we discovered that the problem extends beyond governance issues. It encompasses addressing economic challenges such as excessive unwanted donations, low sales, and marketing issues. Environmental challenges like illegal dumping, excessive carbon footprints, pollution from transportation, short product life cycles, and non-biodegradable products also need to be tackled.
Furthermore, social challenges such as stigma around second-hand clothing, lack of customer behaviour data, inadequate research on social attitudes towards buying clothes, increased violence in operational areas, and seasonal changes in fashion trends must be addressed. Infrastructural and technological challenges, including lack of infrastructure to handle high volumes of donations, inefficient exporting and importing processes, e-commerce limitations, inadequate work environment and staffing, and organizational inefficiencies, also need to be considered.
Therefore, we have redefined the project problem as a comprehensive effort to address the multifaceted challenges faced by Good Sammy, encompassing governance, economic, environmental, social, and infrastructural/technological aspects, to ensure the organization’s long-term sustainability and impact.
Understanding the people affected by the project
Identifying key stakeholder groups is crucial for gathering diverse perspectives and experiences. For the Good Sammy project, we have identified several stakeholder groups that are essential to understanding the dynamics of second-hand shopping and donations. These groups will provide insights into different aspects of the customer experience, including motivations, behaviors, challenges, and opportunities. These groups included regular customers, donors, first-time visitors.
By engaging with these groups through interviews and observations at different locations, we aimed to gather valuable insights that will inform our understanding of the Good Sammy customer experience and help identify areas for improvement and innovation.
Clarifying the project problems
To summarise the key themes across our interviews the team focused on three key questions:
What is in place and working?
Yellow bag council trial; Good shopping experience in regard to customer service from the staff; Sustainability conscious; Updating fashion at a low cost; Positive attitude towards disability employment; Positive reinforcement (feels good to donate); and Has a better market presence (compared to salvos).
What is in place and not working?
Community donation bins (considered scary and unsafe); Females more than males (customer base); Negative experience having donations turned away; Hard to organise/find appropriate sizes; Misconceptions around pricing and durability; and Concerns about clothing quality.
What is not in place and needs to be working?
Positive donation experience; Clarified messages about Good Sammy and reuse retail; Efficiency in purchasing; Clear information about what donations are accepted; Lack of public awareness amongst visitors and international students; Cultural beliefs and stigmas (more influence & awareness); Changing mindsets towards reuse economy; Awareness & marketing needed; Better pricing in retailers (Kmart) compared to second hand; Store consistency; and Donation and clothing swap events.
Generating ideas and concepts to help
These empathy-driven methodologies facilitated creative exploration. By grounding our design thinking process in stakeholder experiences, we fostered a deep sense of empathy and understanding within our team. This allowed us to brainstorm innovative ideas that were not only technically feasible but also deeply resonant with the realities of those we served. Our designs were therefore more likely to be embraced and adopted by stakeholders, leading to greater impact and success.